Medical Journal, Health Articles

About 45 million U.S. residents lack health insurance, but the “rest of us with health coverage are also uninsured” because those with coverage face “terrible, albeit more remote, health care risks,” columnist Laurence Kotlikoff writes in a Boston Globe opinion piece. [click link for full article]

Original post by Diabetes Update

Read entire article

Presidential candidates Sen. Sam Brownback (R-Kan.) and former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee (R) on Tuesday during the second day of a cancer forum in Cedar Rapids, Iowa, discussed issues related to the disease and health care, the [click link for full article]

Original post by Allergy News From Medical News Today

Read entire article

After carrying out independent routine tests on all its products Metz Fresh, LLC found traces of salmonella bacteria in its spinach bags and is voluntarily recalling them. The company and local authorities say they have received no reports of human infection associated with the Metz Fresh spinach. Anybody who may have bought the said spinach should get rid of it immediately, says the company. [click link for full article]

Original post by The Completely Inconsequential Flux Capacitor

Read entire article

A leading epidemiologist has attacked Swedish research that looked at inequalities in patients’ access to cancer drugs across Europe and the world. [click link for full article]

Original post by Allergy News From Medical News Today

Read entire article

In response to the recent final decision by NICE on the use of Velcade for cancer patients with myeloma, the bone marrow cancer, charities Myeloma UK, Cancerbackup and Leukaemia CARE issue the following response: The long awaited decision on Velcade has resulted in a positive approval of the treatment, but many patients will now be ineligible to receive it after a change in the guidance since the preliminary ruling in June. [click link for full article]

Original post by Allergy News From Medical News Today

Read entire article

Dietary restrictions or other strategies that limit fat formation might make pancreatic cell transplants more effective, UT Southwestern Medical Center researchers report.Using animal models, the researchers discovered that pancreatic islet cells transplanted into the liver fail not only because of immune rejection, but also because of overexposure to toxic fats that are synthesized by the surrounding liver cells and flood the pancreatic transplants. [click link for full article]

Original post by The Completely Inconsequential Flux Capacitor

Read entire article

Can the American Cancer Society’s marketing efforts benefit people with diabetes? We may find out next year. In what was arguably one of the biggest news stories in the nonprofit arena recently, The New York Times is reporting that next year, the American Cancer Society announced plans to devote its entire $15 million advertising budget to the consequences of inadequate health coverage.Two 60-second television commercials that form the bulk of the campaign make that point readily apparent. One features images of uninsured cancer patients, appearing hollow and fearful. “This is what a health care crisis looks like to the American Cancer Society,” the narrator begins. “We’re making progress, but it’s not enough if people don’t have access to the care that could save their lives.”While its certainly a change in the organization’s marketing tactics, from the American Cancer Society’s perspective, they see it as a critical element in the fight against cancer. After all, they know that the uninsured are less likely to get recommended cancer screenings, thus are more likely to be diagnosed in more advanced, and often more deadly, stages of the disease. As you might imagine, patients with diabetes are also caught in the dysfunctional U.S. healthcare system, and their prognosis is similarly poor.According to a 2006 report published by the International Diabetes Federation, the authors used estimates that approximately 45 million people in the U.S. (roughly 17% of the working-age population) are not covered by health care insurance. Using simple, back-of-the-envelope calculations, given that roughly 6% of people in the U.S. have diabetes, of the approximately 45 million people with no healthcare cover, we can conservatively estimate that approximately 3 million people with diabetes in the U.S. lack healthcare insurance. According to a number of different studies, their prognosis isn’t good. For example, analysis of a study done in 2002 revealed that when compared to people who had health insurance, people without any form of health insurance who have diabetes received fewer preventive diabetes care interventions and showed generally less-desirable diabetes outcomes. Specifically, a higher percentage of uninsured people had HbA1c levels of 9% or higher; fewer had an annual blood lipid test and/or annual foot exam. It’s hard to imagine, but on average, fully one-fourth (25%) of people with diabetes go without a checkup for 2 years if they have been without health insurance for a year or more vs. only 5% of diabetes patients with insurance. This year, the cancer society formed a collaborative with the heart, diabetes and Alzheimers associations, as well as AARP, to promote awareness of the health access problem. The group adopted as common principles that all Americans deserve quality, affordable health care with transparent costs. While the leaders of the American Diabetes Association, as well as the American Heart Association and the Alzheimers Association applauded the American Cancer Society’s campaign, indicating that progress against chronic disease would also be halted until the country fixed its health care system, so far, none of the other organizations have altered their own advertising budgets to seriously promote the issue. But the Times reports that with nearly $1 billion in revenues, the cancer society is the wealthiest of its peers and has spent about $15 million annually on advertising since 1999. By comparison, GEICO, the automobile insurer with the “Caveman” advertisements, spent about $14 million on network advertising in the first quarter of 2007, according to TNS Media Intelligence, a tracking firm.Healthcare reform is shaping up to be a key issue for the 2008 presidential election, and deservedly so. According to the Washington Post, candidates from both parties are developing plans to address this issue, albiet none of their approaches are terribly radical. But leadership in Washington, including the President and Congress, have largely ignored the issue since 1993, when then President Clinton and his wife attempted to reform the system with what was then derided as “Hillary Care” which died a very painful death. Since then, Congress has done little besides talk about the issue.In August 2007, the U.S. Census Bureau released data showing that a record 47 million Americans did not have health insurance last year. In spite of these issues, the expense of the U.S. healthcare system has grown (and is expected to explode as the baby boom retires) while the U.S. rankings have slipped behind many countries, including most of Europe, Japan, and even countries including Jordan! Our life expectancy now ranks 42nd, down from 11th two decades earlier, according to international numbers provided by the Census Bureau and domestic numbers from the National Center for Health Statistics.Some candidates, notably Republican Mitt Romney, who credits himself for the Massachusetts plan (the nation’s first), has recently said he would leave the responsibility up to individual states. Using California as an example, that may be easier said than done. The San Diego Union-Tribune is reporting that Governor Schwarzenegger’s ambitious plan to overhaul the state’s health care system and cover California’s estimated 6.5 million uninsured residents is quickly running out of time. The Legislature is scheduled to adjourn Sept. 14, and Assembly Speaker Fabian Núñez recently threatened to bring the proposal for a vote of “no confidence” in the California Assembly, but then backed away. Meanwhile, other states are grappling with the issue in different ways.Back in April, for example, The Wall Street Journal reported (if you have an online subscription to the WSJ, the article is accessible here) on a universal coverage program engineered by Tennessee Gov. Phil Bredesen, which won national attention as states try to develop plans for universal health care. The only problem is that Tennessee’s plan may be more affordable for states that cannot afford plans as extensive as those introduced in more affluent states like Massachusetts or California, but participants in the Tennessee plan get coverage up to a maximum of $25,000 for health expenses annually, and only $15,000 of that can go to hospital bills. If a patient becomes seriously ill or has a major accident, they’ll be just as vulnerable as they were before, being forced to either pay the bills themselves or ask the hospital for charity care.To be fair, BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee says that many people in the state can’t afford comprehensive coverage and don’t seem interested in high-deductible policies that offer protection against catastrophic expenses for as little as $100 a month. And for those who would otherwise go uninsured, a big advantage of the Tennessee plan is the steep discounts that BlueCross can extract from doctors and hospitals. That will stretch the $25,000 further, says Stan Roberts, health-practice director at Milliman Inc., a Seattle consulting and actuarial firm.Until Washington approaches this issue seriously and there are Federal standards on healthcare coverage, we’re likely to end up with a patchwork of different plans across the 50 states (some deride it as Balkanized coverage, but truthfully, all of the Balkan countries have better healthcare systems than the U.S.). But if the American Cancer Society’s advertising campaign works, its possible our politicians will be forced to address the issue in a manner not seen since 1993, regardless of who is in the White House! (Source: Scott’s Web Log)

Original post by Scott’s Web Log

Read entire article

A few miscellaneous items you might like to know about over the holiday weekend. Or not — what, you won’t be glued to your computer reading me?! First up, Quote of the Week: “Exubera was not our finest day,”… (Source: Diabetes Mine)

Original post by Diabetes Mine

Read entire article

Treating diabetes during pregnancy can break the link between gestational diabetes and childhood obesity, according to a Kaiser Permanente study featured in the September issue of Diabetes Care.The largest study of its kind, this research shows that the risk of childhood obesity rises in tandem with a pregnant woman’s blood sugar level and that untreated gestational diabetes nearly doubles a child’s risk of becoming obese by age 5 to 7. [click link for full article]

Original post by The Completely Inconsequential Flux Capacitor

Read entire article

The number of uninsured U.S. residents grew by 2.2 million in 2006 to 47 million, up from 44.8 million in 2005, according to data released on Tuesday by the Census Bureau, USA Today reports (Appleby, USA Today, 8/29). [click link for full article]

Original post by The Completely Inconsequential Flux Capacitor

Read entire article